Skip to main content
#
The DOT Doctor:
Add to My Yahoo!
The DOT Doctor Speaks
Saturday, June 26 2010
CSA 2010 is here!  Know how to protect yourself and your company.

CSA 2010 is a new minefield that the government has created for truckers and trucking companies to traverse.  This one can stop you dead in your tracts.  So be prepared!

O/Os remember you are the carrier, the fleet, the driver.  Remember DOT does not care if you have 1 truck or 1,000,001 trucks.  As long as you have a DOT number, you are bound by DOT regulations and therefore CSA 2010 standards.

CSA 2010 claims to not directly rate drivers as to put them out of work.  This is true and false at the same time.  It will provide enhanced tools for Safety Investigators (SIs) to identify drivers with safety performance problems during motor carrier investigations.  As a result, motor carriers and drivers will have the opportunity to correct the specific safety performance problems.  (This is not an "opportunity" but a requirement.  Drivers are noted, by name, as to their infractions.)  CSA 2010 is designed to meet one overriding objective: to increase safety on the Nation’s roads.  (If this were totally true, it will target all vehicles not just commercial vehicles.)  Therefore, it is, by design, a positive program for drivers and carriers with strong safety performance records.  Also, it will send a strong message that drivers and carriers with poor safety performance histories need to improve.  (CSA 2010)  In short, low scorers will have black boxes (On-board recording devices) put in their trucks for full monitoring by Big Brother.  CSA 2010 is the answer for allowing the government to "invisibly" ride along side you in the cab of your truck and your only recourse is to outsmart the DOT at their own game.

If drivers are not "directly" rated then explain - driver interventions and notifications.

1.      Driver Interventions - Any driver violations identified and addressed during carrier investigations that are not corrected may result in a driver Notice of Violation (NOV) or Notice of Claim (NOC). These are the only driver interventions at this time.

2.      Driver Notifications - Drivers will be notified by mail and may be contacted by a FMCSA investigator.

 

Let's demystify the CSA 2010 initiative.  Learn how this new data collection system directly affects you as a driver or carrier.

 

Download this new paper directed at driver protection by the DOT Doctor.  Available at: http://thedotdoctor.com/i/u/10035243/i/Debunking_CSA_2010.pdf

As always, questions and comments welcomed!
Posted by: Andrea Sitler PhD AT 08:10 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, May 20 2010

Some dates of importance or interest

Mark your Calendar


...JUNE
4-6: NAST/7th ANNUAL GREAT LAKES TRUCK SHOW, Cabela’s Sporting Goods, Dundee,
Mich.
JUNE
8-10: COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SAFETY ALLIANCE ANNUAL ROAD CHECK, www.cvsa.org, (202) 775-1623.


JUNE
11-12: OAK GROVE TRUCKERS JAMBOREE, Oak Grove Petro, Oak Grove, Mo., www.oakgrovepetro.com, (816)
690-4455.
THIS WAS A LOT OF FUN WHEN I TOOK THE KIDS AND WENT THE OTHER YEAR! THEY EVEN GOT TO MEET "WENDY" IN PERSON.

JUNE
17-19: THE GREAT WEST TRUCK SHOW, Las Vegas, (888) 349-4287, www.greatwesttruckshow.com.


JUNE
18-19: MUSIC CITY CHAPTER Antique and Working Truck Show, American Truck
Historical Society and Cumberland Plateau Antique Tractor and Gas Engine
Show, Crossville Fairground, Crossville, Tenn., (931) 200-3203.


JUNE
25-27: NAST/CHARLESTON TRUCK SHOW, Charleston, S.C., Lucas Fry at (843)
819-0318.


JULY
8-9: WALCOTT TRUCKERS JAMBOREE, Iowa 80 Truckstop, Walcott, Iowa,
iowa80truckstop.com, (563) 284-6961.
HOPE TO MAKE ONE YEAR.

AUG.
13-14: WAUPUN TRUCK-N-SHOW, Waupun, Wis., www.waupuntrucknshow.com, (920)
324-9985.


AUG.
13-15: GREAT SALT LAKE KIDNEY KAMP TRUCK SHOW, Thanksgiving Point, Utah, Lehi
exit 284 from I-15, (800) 877-1320.


AUG.
14: MUSIC CITY CHAPTER Antique and Working Truck Show, American Truck
Historical Society, Putnam County Fair, Cookeville, Tenn., (931) 235-1311.


AUG.
26-28: THE GREAT AMERICAN TRUCKING SHOW, Dallas, (888) 349-4287, www.gatsonline.com.
WE GO EVERY YEAR. GREAT SHOW! ENTIRE FAMILY ENJOYS THE EVENT.

SEPT.
10-12: MIDWEST ALL-TRUCK NATIONALS, Riverside, Mo., www.alltrucknats.com.


SEPT.
12-18: CVSA BRAKE SAFETY WEEK, www.cvsa.org,
or (202) 775-1623.


SEPT.
17-19: RICHARD CRANE MEMORIAL TRUCK SHOW, St. Ignace, Mich., Ed Reavie, (906)
643-8087.


SEPT.
24-25: MUSIC CITY CHAPTER 20th Annual Antique and Working Truck Show,
American Truck Historical Society and Middle Tenn. Antique and Engine Tractor
Show, Hyder-Burks Agriculture Pavilion, Cookeville Tenn., (931) 235-1311.


OCT.
1-2: “GUILTY BY ASSOCIATION” TRUCK SHOW & CUSTOMER EXPO, Chrome Shop
Mafia/4 State Trucks, www.chromeshopmafia.com,
(417) 624-2900.


OCT.
16-17: GOLDEN STATE TRUCKING EXPO, Fairplex, Pomona, Calif., www.thetruckshowlatino.com.


OCT.
23-24: TRUCKIN’ FOR KIDS, Toyota Speedway, Irwindale, Calif., www.prideandpolish.com, click on
Truckin’ For Kids.


NOV.
12-14: MECA SOUTH FLORIDA TRUCK SHOW, Medley, Fla., Eric Garcia, (305)
884-2028.


Read more at: www.cvsa.org
Posted by: The DOT Doctor AT 04:10 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Wednesday, April 21 2010
It's annual.  It's no surprise.  But what week is it this year?

CVSA sets Roadcheck for June 8-10

Published April, 21 2010

The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance has scheduled its annual Roadcheck event for June 8-10. CVSA scheduled the event to eliminate scheduling problems during the weekend following Memorial Day, May 24.

Roadcheck is a 72-hour event in which an estimated 10,000 inspectors set up more than 1,000 checkpoints on highways across North America to monitor truck safety compliance.

Last year, the vehicle compliance rate of 80.4 percent was the highest since 1996, CVSA said. The driver compliance rate of 95.7 percent was the highest ever.

 

 

Source: http://www.ccjdigital.com/cvsa-sets-roadcheck-for-june-8-10

Posted by: The DOT Doctor AT 11:27 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Tuesday, April 13 2010
Trucking companies have USIS or DAC as most drivers have come to know the report.  Trucking companies can write ANYTHING they want about you and use this a poor retention tool.  Companies low on the ethics scale will purposely falsify a DAC report in a desperate attempt to make a driver unemployable so they are forced to return to that company.

Smarter companies see through this facade.  Many companies have chosen to avoid this untrustworthy service.  The information is not reliable due to the allowed collection methods.  If DAC would take the time to verify the data entered by the companies, notify the driver and ask for their side of the story as well as proof from both the company and the driver; then the information may be more reliable.  At least an attempt for honesty and good faith on the part of USIS/DAC would be recognized.  Even credit reports require proof.  Why then is DAC a one sided street?

Correcting incorrect DAC reports may be possible however it is a long and complex process.  Just obtaining a copy of one's DAC is a foreboding process.  Company's bent on protecting their interests further impede the process by often telling the driver they will clean up their post and then order their "DAC reporter" to not do so or to wait until a protest letter arrives.  If DAC is a report of truth, why make it so hard?

Recruiters are paid to fill seats.  They will promise the world to do so.  Some even do this in good faith not realizing the real story that occurs once a driver passes through the door.  How can they not know?  Because many recruiters have never even visited the terminal.  They work from a remote or home office and have no real contact with the "real world" of the driver.

So what can a driver or O/O or even a fleet owner do to protect themselves?  How can you avoid a potentially bad company?  Research!  Right now the only way to find out if that new job offer is all it appears to be is to take the plunge or do some recon.  Talk to drivers.  Use Facebook or other social networking sites, take time at a truck stop or shipping/receiving location to search out and find drivers from your prospective new company.  Ask the questions that matter to you.  Remember each driver has their own agenda.  What is important to me may be meaningless to you.  Get the facts on what you care about finding in a company. 

I once found a company by seeking out potentials in a truck magazine then looking to see if I found them in the area I was stuck in.  When I finally did not find the a potential company, I knew it was right for me.  Why?  Because I was stuck running in a location that I wished to be far from.  At orientation the owner came in and did the Hi, Welcome speach that any good company owner would do.  He then went around the room and asked why we came here and how we learned of the company.  I told my story.  He found it strange but was intrigued.  It was what worked for me.

Other alternatives are internet searches.  Find their Hover report, check Rip Off Report and search for that company on blogs.  Read all you can find.  Check Safer Stats.  Now, take what a driver says with a grain of salt.  We all complain when we are upset at a company.  But when you find bad report after bad report, year in and year out...you can see the pattern.  If you find excellent reports and then sudden groupings of poor ones, find out what changed.  Was the company recently bought out?  Did the kids take over?  What happened?  Take time to investigate.  Interview the company.  Don't just jump ship and hope you land well.  Do your homework because they are doing their homework on you.

Would it not be easier if there was on place to find this information?  Well here is my proposal.  I propose a DAC type system for companies.  If companies can report on drivers as will, then drivers should be allowed their say.  Drivers and O/Os need a place to gather info on companies and their practices. 

What I would like from my readers -
(1) List the company name and address (city, state is fine)
(2) List driver type (O/O, co, regional, local, etc...)
(3) Time in service at said company
(4) Tell your story.  Good or bad.  Share the pros and cons of the company.  List names, facts and dates.
(5) Try to hold opinions and stick to facts but feel free to express yourself.  Do limit the cursing please.
(6) Tell what you tried to do to reverse the issue and with whom you addressed the situation.
(7) What are you doing now?  Are you suing?  Did you file a BBB report?  OOIDA contact?  What avenues are you taking to gain justice?
(8) If experience was good - what type of driver would you recommend to this company?  Who should they contact?  What qualifications are needed?
(9) Anything else you feel is relevant.
(10) If you feel comfortable; leave your name or handle, location and email.  It would be great if other drivers could contact you for more info.  If not comfortable with that, that is fine.  This is all optional.

Let's get this going on here at one location for us all.  Just leave a comment to this post and you will be heard.
If there is enough response, I am willing to pull Safer Scores and add them to your posts.  I will also expand these postings into their area or web site so we all can benefit.

Now it is all up to you!  Take the bull by the horns and let your words be heard.  Drivers unite!  It is time we fight back to the unjust ways of DAC.
Posted by: The DOT Doctor AT 01:30 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, April 08 2010

A National Intermodal Shift

William B. Cassidy and John D. Boyd | Apr 5, 2010 4:00AM GMT

The Journal of Commerce Magazine - News Story

http://www.joc.com/government-regulation/national-intermodal-shift (sign-in required)

This cover article speaks of the DOT's plan to move truck traffic to ocean and rail methods.  Deputy Secretary Porcari told Congress “We want to keep goods movement on water as long as possible, and then on rail as long as possible and truck it for the last miles.” That is, let’s transform the trucking industry into drayage carriers for the railroads – just what Norfolk Southern CEO Moorman called for a couple of years ago.  Secretary LaHood spoke recently of how well he has been able to work with railroads, which have received a great deal of DOT funding.

 

Moving truck traffic to the rail would slow the delivery time.  Rails, while gaining in competition, are still not able to handle time sensitive freight.  Today's inventories are leaned and set to work on JIT delivery schedules.  Rail and ocean cannot accommodate this type of system.  In essence, the government is telling big business to change their method of operation.  Companies are leaning inventory and stock to save money, space and general overhead charges.  They have invested much in the last 10 years to achieve this new structure.  I do not see them changing back to the old ways willingly.

JB and Schneider embraced the intermodal methods and changed their business methods accordingly.  Driver miles were cut almost in half as long haul freight disappeared to the rails.  This also meant a change in client base for these carriers.  Swift, who happily grabbed up the Wal-Mart account, split their transport method between rail and ground freight (truck) for JIT customers.  Automotive clients always required JIT service.

While a move to rail claims to be more environmentally friendly and can save up to 30% in transportation costs, time will always be the issue.  Rail is limited in its area of service and ocean is even a slower option.  Claims processing through these channels are a nightmare and one of the main reasons many companies avoid these options totally. 

The government explains that this would help relieve the congestion on our highways, promote safety highways and reduce the cost of infrastructure.  Highways that no longer have to support the weight of heavy truck traffic are cheaper to build.  It is implied that in doing so, fuel cost can be lowered due to the reduced highway funds needed.  I find this hard to believe since the government is already ear marking those funds for railway improvements.

If these were to happen, inventory costs would raise along with replenishment times.  This would mean consumer costs would rise to compensate for the increase.  Large cities may feel a slight relief in traffic but for Main Street America, I doubt much change on the highway will be noticed.

 

More info - http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/455871-Logistics_news_Maritime_DOT_unveils_effort_to_expand_America_s_marine_highways.php?nid=4283&source=title&rid=14370409

Posted by: Andrea Sitler PhD AT 01:05 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Saturday, April 03 2010
April 2 was no April fool when it came to pass that EOBR will now be required on all trucks who's company has a 10% or greater violation rate of HOS.  This is one time 10%, not the twice 10% as first spoke of by the FMCSA.  Compliance begins June 4 and in full force by 2012.  Adding insult to injury, even O/Os with their own authority leased to a company falling upon this non-compliance statue will be forced to install an EOBR. 

Drivers, O/O and trucking company owners; we must unite in a common effort to maintain workable conditions for the industry.  Safety has to be priority but who knows better what makes a safe driver than those of us in this industry.  The government only knows what it reads.  We must stand up for our rights.  We must unite for adequate HOS and enforcement not encroachment and infringements.   Rouge drivers need to be removed from our highways.  Education is needed.  Many violations are due to pure misinterpertation of the regulations due to their complexities.  While blantant violators brought the wrath of the government upon the industry, not carriers should burden the weight.

There are many good carriers, drivers and O/Os in our industry.  There are many new rules coming at us quickly.  One that springs to mind is the new sleep apnea testing.  This added to the blood pressure standards and other issues that arise from the required lifestyle of a driver, will place any experienced driver out of work.  Driver "life expectancy" behind the wheel will be reduced to under 10 years unless we do something NOW to curb these attacks from the government agencies.  Get involved now before it is too late.   Write your Congressman, join driver groups and take action to save your profession.  Our voices do count and we, as a group, can be heard.  Do not let the government push us all out until all that are left are yellow and orange trucks on the highway overseen by Big Brother.  Let us learn from what is happening in the car and bank industry.

Read more at: http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_Reports/2010/Apr/040210-FMCSA-targets.htm
Posted by: Andrea Sitler PhD AT 10:02 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, April 01 2010

Implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standards will have an impact on supply management

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are replacing the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as a global standard.  Currently the US relies up GAAP for their accounting methods, however in 2012 a major change is coming.  IT implementations must begin this year for publically traded companies to be on track.

While reporting standards are the bean counters' problems, these changes affect all aspects of the business including Supply Chain Management.   SCMs will be directly affected in four areas.  Todd Neely explains the changes coming our way.

Supply Management Impacts

Four major changes IFRS has on supply chain management are LIFO, inventory valuation, long-term contracts and management responsibility.

Last in, first out (LIFO). The change to LIFO is easy to understand. IFRS does not permit inventory to be valued using the LIFO method. If you are valuing inventory using LIFO, implementing IFRS will require switching from LIFO to another method. The switch can have large tax consequences and should be thoroughly investigated to minimize taxes.

Inventory valuation. Under GAAP, inventory is valued once. As long as the inventory sits on the shelf, it reflects the historical prices paid. Under IFRS, inventory is valued at current market price. For many inventory items, the number of turns is high, resulting in current market price being equal to historical price paid. But for other items, significant changes between the price paid and current market price will require repeated revaluation to report the inventory's true value.

Long-term contracts. Under GAAP, possession and ownership are not the same. Under lease or consignment agreements, you can have possession but do not own the inventory. The inventory would not have to be included in the reporting of your financial statements. Under IFRS, when you take possession, you take responsibility. When you are responsible for an item, it is to be reported on the financial statements.

Management responsibility. The responsibility of management in making decisions on how financial data is collected and reported is much greater under IFRS. GAAP has rules and guidelines for most situations. The trick is to determine which rule or guideline applies to the situation you are investigating. Once the rule is found, apply it. Under IFRS, there are fewer rules or guidelines. You are responsible to do what is best to report the true financial condition of the situation. Whatever your decision, you will be responsible to consistently perform the same action repeatedly. If you change — you have to report why.

If you would like to read more, the article may be found in the weekly publication, Inside Supply Management. E-version is available at: http://www.ism.ws/pubs/ISMMag/ismarticle.cfm?ItemNumber=20069

Posted by: Andrea Sitler PhD AT 05:32 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Wednesday, February 24 2010

The World Trade Organization has lobbied for standardized practices and a common frequency to be implemented for radio frequency identification devices (RFID) for many years.  In 2006, the ISO introduced the ISO/IEC 18000-6 Amendment 1 incorporating the EPCglobal Generation 2 UHF RFID Air Interface protocol which had the intention of making available a license to manufactures to create devices fitting both the EPCglobal standard and the ISO standard.  This still did not establish a global standard but was a first step in that direction.    Further success is now being seen in this movement thanks to the announcement by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) on February 19 introducing ISO 17367:2009, Supply chain applications of RFID – Product tagging. 

Global logistics requires better tracking methods, e.g. traceability.   Traceability is defined by the ISO "as the tracking and tracing of product and information related to it at each stage of a chain of production, processing, distribution, and selling.  The development of radio frequency identification (RFID), including peripheral devices and their applications, is indispensable for increasing the safety and reliability of products for consumers".  Craig K. Harmon, Chair of TC 122/WG 10 comments: "ISO 17367:2009 will provide higher level security of products worldwide using RFID technology.  It will enable easy and efficient exchange of commodities in international trade and logistics. "

 

Anyone who has used RFID knows the value this implementation can add to a supply chain.  As this technology has gained recognition and increased in usage, the price per unit has decreased allowing RFID to become an affordable option for many businesses.  True global usage has been uncertain due to the lack of a common global frequency and lack of standardization.  While a common frequency is still needed, the ISO has untaken major steps in the area of standardization.  It is important to note that these standards only address product tagging (identification) and not packaging. 

Freight containers (ocean containers), product packaging, transport units and RTIs (returnable transport items) have recently become regulated by the ISO under different certifications. 

ISO 17367:2009 is applicable to a wide range of industries and it has been elaborated in order to ensure compatibility at the physical, command and data levels with four other International Standards under the general title: Supply chain applications of RFID. International Standards within this suite are interoperable and non-interfering:

·         ISO 17363:2007, Supply chain applications of RFID – Freight containers

·         ISO 17364:2009, Supply chain applications of RFID – Returnable transport items (RTIs)

·         ISO 17365:2009, Supply chain applications of RFID – Transport units

·         ISO 17366:2009, Supply chain applications of RFID – Product packaging.

These International Standards define the technical aspects and data hierarchy of information required in each layer of the supply chain.  ISO technical committee ISO/TC 122/WG 10, Packaging, in collaboration with ISO/TC 104, Freight containers developed this series of standards. TC 122/WG 10 has undertaken a revision of this suite of standards to provide better clarity to the encoded methods to be utilized and support for sensor technology. (http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1293)

As the global supply chain grows, it is reasonable to expect to see more ISO standardization in this field.  Standardization will aid in cost reduction, loss reduction and overall lower costs in the transportation aspect of the supply chain.

Posted by: Dr. Sitler AT 04:50 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, January 07 2010
Hope everyone had a wonderful and safe holiday season.  As the New Year begins, I have learned of a very dangerous new drug that is being offered to our children.  Would like to share this information with you so together we can try to keep our families safe.

Mhj

New Drug at Schools
Posted by Kadriye Tunc on March 10, 2008

Send-to-friends Thank you for viewing! You were the 280190th person to view this photo.
280231 people viewed
56%
Viewer Goal: 500,000 people

Help spread this important message:

This is a new drug known as 'strawberry quick'. There is a very scary thing going on in the schools right now that we all need to be aware of. There is a type of crystal meth going around that looks like strawberry pop rocks (the candy that sizzles and 'pops' in your mouth). It also smells like strawberry and it is being handed out to kids in school yards. They are calling it strawberry meth or strawberry quick. Kids are ingesting this thinking that it is candy and being rushed off to the hospital in dire condition. It also comes in chocolate, peanut butter, cola, cherry, grape and orange. Please instruct your children not to accept candy from strangers and even not to accept candy that looks like this from a friend (who may have been given it and believe it is candy) and to take any that they may have to a teacher, principal, etc. immediately. Pass this email on to as many people as you can (even if they don't have kids) so that we can raise awareness and hopefully prevent any tragedies from occurring.

Posted by: DOT DOCTOR AT 11:16 am   |  Permalink   |  Email
Thursday, December 24 2009
Just want to wish everyone a very Merry Christmas and a safe New Year!

Thank you all for being a part of the DOT Doctor family and we look forward to our continuing relationship in the New Year.

I am sure you have all heard about the Arrow ordeal by now. (If not check out my Facebook page).  Awful!  But in all this, it was wonderful to see OOIDA, Schneider and all the other drivers and companies who stepped up to help out a fellow driver.  Great Christmas spirit!

Anyone celebrating - Happy Holidays, be safe and have a prosperous New Year!
Posted by: Andrea Sitler, PhD AT 12:36 pm   |  Permalink   |  Email

Bookmark and Share
Email
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Add to favorites
Digg
Delicious
StumbleUpon
MySpace

800# is no longer in operations.

Please dial direct at:       903-910-9075

Search
 
Bookmark and Share
Email
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Add to favorites
Digg
Delicious
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Cost of trucking
With the small profit margin, while pay unnecessary fines? TDD can help!
Site Mailing List  Sign Guest Book  View Guest Book 
TDD: Compliance, Business, Logistics and Risk Management Services, Financial Analysis and Tax Filing

The DOT Doctor
USA, Mexico and Canada

phone 1- 903-910-9009 US Services

                                                    1-903-910-9075 Mexico/Canada Services

info@thedotdoctor.com

Copyright © 2017 by The DOT Doctor

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Published by:

The DOT Doctor

Email: Webmaster@thedotdoctor.com

Website: http://thedotdoctor.com

Free SEO Tools

Search Engine Submission - AddMe

Google+